Usuari:KRLS/TR/ru

De la Viquipèdia, l'enciclopèdia lliure

Answers by comunity order: Català - English - Castellano - Deutsch - Français - Polski - 日本語 - Nederlands - Italiano - Português - Svenska - Русский - 中文 - Norsk (Bokmål) - Suomi - Volapük - Română - Türkçe - Esperanto - Slovenčina

This is a survey for my Research Project with aim to know the indicators that measure the quality of an article according to the wikipedist community. If you want to answer this survey, just follow the link EDIT, copy and paste the pattern below, paste it in the end and answer the questions. I need tour help! I’m in a hurry so please; answer it as soon as you can.

Attention: Please, do not edit the pattern, just copy and paste in the bottom of the page and answer following the pertinent indications with (<-- -->).

If you have a problem with some questions you can say me your problems in my talk.

Template[modifica]

ru:User:[modifica]

  • Country:
  • Age:
  • Sex:
  1. You have to fill the following table just with a number from 0 to 10, according to how much you agree with the sentence. 0 means you totally disagree and 10 you totally agree.
Quality indicator Your score from 0 to 10
1. The number of articles.
2. The size of a wikipedia article.
3. The number of users.
4. Number of active users.
5. The speed of the vandalisms reversions.
6. Number of edits for article
7. The number of maintenance templates
8. Number of articles with a maintenance templates
9. Number of users that contribute with the wikipedia maintenance
10. References of external sources.
11. Projects specifically dedicated to improve wikipedia's quality.[1]
12. Community contributions to these projects[2]
13. Number of quality articles, good articles...
14. Number of visitors of a wikipedia.[3]
15. Structure of the categories.[4]
16. Redaction and clarity of the articles.
17. Existence of images at wikipedia articles.
18. Are most of your articles at an ordinary encyclopedia?[5]
19. Variety of terms (not included at ordinary encyclopedias).
20. External links to help visitors find more information.
  1. Are there other quality indicators? Which:

Answers[modifica]

ru:User:Rave[modifica]

  • Country: Russia/Россия
  • Age: 24
  • Sex: oh yes
  1. You have to fill the following table just with a number from 0 to 10, according to how much you agree with the sentence. 0 means you totally disagree and 10 you totally agree.
Quality indicator Your score from 0 to 10
1. The number of articles. 8
2. The size of a wikipedia article. 8
3. The number of users. 6
4. Number of active users. 10
5. The speed of the vandalisms reversions. 8
6. Number of edits for article 3
7. The number of maintenance templates 6
8. Number of articles with a maintenance templates 4
9. Number of users that contribute with the wikipedia maintenance 7
10. References of external sources. 8
11. Projects specifically dedicated to improve wikipedia's quality.[6] 7
12. Community contributions to these projects[7] 10
13. Number of quality articles, good articles... 6
14. Number of visitors of a wikipedia.[8] 10
15. Structure of the categories.[9] 10
16. Redaction and clarity of the articles. 8
17. Existence of images at wikipedia articles. 7
18. Are most of your articles at an ordinary encyclopedia?[10] 2
19. Variety of terms (not included at ordinary encyclopedias). 6
20. External links to help visitors find more information. 8
  1. Are there other quality indicators? Which:
  • Mass media interest and reaction outside of Internet (see).
  • Number of thematic portals.
  • Number of citating in other media resources in information reasons and like "Did you know, that... ? (from Wikipedia, free encyclopedia)".
  • Number of participants with higher education, science grades, any other experience in different sciences and disciplines.

...

  • etc


ru:User:Александр Сигачёв[modifica]

  • Country: Россия / Russia
  • Age: 26
  • Sex: M
  1. You have to fill the following table just with a number from 0 to 10, according to how much you agree with the sentence. 0 means you totally disagree and 10 you totally agree.
Quality indicator Your qualification from 0 to 10
1. The number of articles. 7
2. The size of a wikipedia article. 6
3. The number of users. 3
4. Number of active users. 7
5. The speed of the vandalisms reversions. 6
6. Number of edits for article 7
7. The number of maintenance templates 4
8. Number of articles with a maintenance templates 4
9. Number of users that contribute with the wikipedia maintenance 5
10. References of external sources. 10
11. Projects specifically dedicated to improve wikipedia's quality.[11] 10
12. Community contributions to these projects[12] 8
13. Number of quality articles, good articles... 9
14. Number of visitors of a wikipedia.[13] 5
15. Structure of the categories.[14] 5
16. Redaction and clarity of the articles. 7
17. Existence of images at wikipedia articles. 8
18. Are most of your articles at an ordinary encyclopedia?[15] 4
19. Variety of terms (not included at ordinary encyclopedias). 4
20. External links to help visitors find more information. 10

ru:User:Vicki Doronina[modifica]

  • 'Country: United Kingdom
  • Age: 33
  • Sex: F
Quality indicator Your score from 0 to 10
1. The number of articles. 7
2. The size of a wikipedia article. 4
3. The number of users. 7
4. Number of active users. 7
5. The speed of the vandalisms reversions. 9
6. Number of edits for article 7
7. The number of maintenance templates 9
8. Number of articles with a maintenance templates 7
9. Number of users that contribute with the wikipedia maintenance 7
10. References of external sources. 5
11. Projects specifically dedicated to improve wikipedia's quality.[16] 6
12. Community contributions to these projects[17] 8
13. Number of quality articles, good articles... 8
14. Number of visitors of a wikipedia.[18] 6
15. Structure of the categories.[19] 6
16. Redaction (?) and clarity of the articles. 7
17. Existence of images at wikipedia articles. 7
18. Are most of your articles at an ordinary encyclopedia?[20] 6
19. Variety of terms (not included at ordinary encyclopedias). 8
20. External links to help visitors find more information. 7
  1. Are there other quality indicators? Which: all these should be statistical not arbitrary - open 100 Russian articles and calculate number of pictures, templates, users etc.

ru:User:Alexei Kouprianov[modifica]

  • Country: Russia
  • Age: 37
  • Sex: M
  1. You have to fill the following table just with a number from 0 to 10, according to how much you agree with the sentence. 0 means you totally disagree and 10 you totally agree.
Quality indicator Your score from 0 to 10
1. The number of articles. 7
2. The size of a wikipedia article. 8
3. The number of users. 3
4. Number of active users. 5
5. The speed of the vandalisms reversions. 8
6. Number of edits for article 7
7. The number of maintenance templates 6
8. Number of articles with a maintenance templates 6
9. Number of users that contribute with the wikipedia maintenance 8
10. References of external sources. 8
11. Projects specifically dedicated to improve wikipedia's quality.[21] 4
12. Community contributions to these projects[22] 6
13. Number of quality articles, good articles... 5
14. Number of visitors of a wikipedia.[23] 6
15. Structure of the categories.[24] 4
16. Redaction and clarity of the articles. 6
17. Existence of images at wikipedia articles. 8
18. Are most of your articles at an ordinary encyclopedia?[25] 6
19. Variety of terms (not included at ordinary encyclopedias). 6
20. External links to help visitors find more information. 6
  1. Are there other quality indicators? Which:
  • It was extremely difficult to evaluate all these quantitative indicators without a serious investigation, so I just put the figures which expressed my overall impression. As an assistant professor in the faculty for Sociology (even though my specific field of interst is the History of Ealy Modern Science), I may only guess what conclusions you may draw from the subjective evaluations of some objectively collectible data by uninformed observers.

ru:User:Sir Shurf[modifica]

  • Country:Russia
  • Age:28
  • Sex:M
  1. You have to fill the following table just with a number from 0 to 10, according to how much you agree with the sentence. 0 means you totally disagree and 10 you totally agree.
Quality indicator Your score from 0 to 10
1. The number of articles. 6
2. The size of a wikipedia article. 8
3. The number of users. 7
4. Number of active users. 8
5. The speed of the vandalisms reversions. 9
6. Number of edits for article 3
7. The number of maintenance templates 4
8. Number of articles with a maintenance templates 5
9. Number of users that contribute with the wikipedia maintenance 4
10. References of external sources. 10
11. Projects specifically dedicated to improve wikipedia's quality.[26] 9
12. Community contributions to these projects[27] 9
13. Number of quality articles, good articles... 10
14. Number of visitors of a wikipedia.[28] 9
15. Structure of the categories.[29] 6
16. Redaction and clarity of the articles. 8
17. Existence of images at wikipedia articles. 7
18. Are most of your articles at an ordinary encyclopedia?[30] 7
19. Variety of terms (not included at ordinary encyclopedias). 5
20. External links to help visitors find more information. 10

ru:User:infovarius[modifica]

  • Country: Russia (Россия)
  • Age: 26
  • Sex: m
  1. You have to fill the following table just with a number from 0 to 10, according to how much you agree with the sentence. 0 means you totally disagree and 10 you totally agree.

All here about of wikipedia.

Quality indicator Your score from 0 to 10
1. The number of articles. 7
2. The size of a wikipedia article. 7
3. The number of users. 3
4. Number of active users. 3
5. The speed of the vandalisms reversions. 8
6. Number of edits for article 5 (what for?)
7. The number of maintenance templates 8
8. Number of articles with a maintenance templates 5
9. Number of users that contribute with the wikipedia maintenance 5
10. References of external sources. 3
11. Projects specifically dedicated to improve wikipedia's quality.[31] 6
12. Community contributions to these projects[32] 6
13. Number of quality articles, good articles... 4
14. Number of visitors of a wikipedia.[33] i don't know
15. Structure of the categories.[34] 8
16. Redaction and clarity of the articles. 6
17. Existence of images at wikipedia articles. 5
18. Are most of your articles at an ordinary encyclopedia?[35] 5
19. Variety of terms (not included at ordinary encyclopedias). 7
20. External links to help visitors find more information. 6
  1. Are there other quality indicators? Which:
  • coherence (mutual hyperlinks and close content) of articles about one topic
  • reliability of facts
  • data updating about recent phenomena

Comments[modifica]

  1. ↑ A sample could be: List of articles every Wikipedia should have
  2. ↑ Projects referred on point 11.
  3. ↑ This means that people believe in the wikipedia content.
  4. ↑ The order and the way to find articles at their category.
  5. ↑ Ordinary encyclopedias: Enncyclopedia Britannica.
  6. ↑ A sample could be: List of articles every Wikipedia should have
  7. ↑ Projects referred on point 11.
  8. ↑ This means that people believe in the wikipedia content.
  9. ↑ The order and the way to find articles at their category.
  10. ↑ Ordinary encyclopedias: Enncyclopedia Britannica.
  11. ↑ A sample could be: List of articles every Wikipedia should have
  12. ↑ Projects referred on point 11.
  13. ↑ This means that people believe in the wikipedia content.
  14. ↑ The order and the way to find articles at their category.
  15. ↑ Ordinary encyclopedias: Enncyclopedia Britannica.
  16. ↑ A sample could be: List of articles every Wikipedia should have
  17. ↑ Projects referred on point 11.
  18. ↑ This means that people believe in the wikipedia content.
  19. ↑ The order and the way to find articles at their category.
  20. ↑ Ordinary encyclopedias: Enncyclopedia Britannica.
  21. ↑ A sample could be: List of articles every Wikipedia should have
  22. ↑ Projects referred on point 11.
  23. ↑ This means that people believe in the wikipedia content.
  24. ↑ The order and the way to find articles at their category.
  25. ↑ Ordinary encyclopedias: Enncyclopedia Britannica.
  26. ↑ A sample could be: List of articles every Wikipedia should have
  27. ↑ Projects referred on point 11.
  28. ↑ This means that people believe in the wikipedia content.
  29. ↑ The order and the way to find articles at their category.
  30. ↑ Ordinary encyclopedias: Enncyclopedia Britannica.
  31. ↑ A sample could be: List of articles every Wikipedia should have
  32. ↑ Projects referred on point 11.
  33. ↑ This means that people believe in the wikipedia content.
  34. ↑ The order and the way to find articles at their category.
  35. ↑ Ordinary encyclopedias: Enncyclopedia Britannica.
Obtingut de «https://ca.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Usuari:KRLS/TR/ru&oldid=2031443»